I'm going to give you the top 30 pitchers from 4 different important catagories. For this season or next it might be in your interest to hesitate before wagering against any of these pitchers. For a good deal, and in a spot where the starter plays well; certainly consider a play on. A note: all of the data considers only pitchers who have pitched more than 50 games looking back over the last 10 seasons. I have also filtered out pitchers who haven not pitched this season. Let's have a look at the top 30 pitchers from each of the four catagories straight out of the database:

DEFINITIONS:
=====================
OxS = On Base percent times Slugging percent.
On Base Percent (OBP) = ( H + BB + HBP ) / ( AB + BB + HBP +SF)
where…
H=Hits
BB=Walks
HBP=Hit by pitch
AB=At bats
SF=Sacrifice Flies
Slugging percent (SLG) = ( (1B) + (2X 2B) + (3 X 3B) + (4 X HR) ) / (AB)
in other words…
SLG = TB / AB
where…
TB=Total Bases
AB=At Bats
Note: It should go without saying that a very low OxS for pitchers in a last 50 game sample is a good measurement of talent. Next up, BB:K's…
=====================
BB:K Ratio = Walks divided by Strikes
Very simple but an excellent measurement of pitcher control.
=====================
WHIP = ( BB + H ) / IP
WHIP (Walks plus hits per inning pitched) is a good way to measure a pitcher's ability to prevent batter from reaching base.
=====================
xERA-ERA
xERA-ERA is a great way to anticipate an underrated pitcher becomming great. There are so many factors that going into sports sabarmetrics analysis so we come up with an expection. There are many reasons a pitcher may not have met these expectations this season, but very often the case it luck. If it is luck based, then poor fielding is the case. Now we get into field independent sports sabermetrics which I will get into later. I think that if you go this deep into a breakdown of the game you're putting too much weight on the starting pitcher…he is not the whole team as much as it may seem! Sometimes the generalized stats are more of what you want unless you are a real shark who knows how to snuff out every ounce of value! Look into fielding independent pitcher statistics if so inclined. FIP and BABIP are great. Anyways…
————————————————————————————————–
FROM THE HISTORICAL ARCHIVE
——————————
NFL
"NFL 12.5.2010
STEELERS for 2 UNITS WINNER!
….and
MONEY LINE for 1 UNIT WINNER!

PATRIOTS for 3 UNITS WINNER!
Brady sports the sparkling record of 117-38 as a starter, and is 91-61 ATS. Look for the Patriots to make Mark Sanchez's life miserable on Monday and take the smile of the face of Rex Ryan. This game may go to -4 as the sharp money is on New England…So if your playing…Play now.

RAMS for 3 UNITS WINNER!
Note: If you can get the Rams for -3 watch for how much juice you are laying…you may consider dropping this to 2.5 or 2 units if the juice is heavy. If you have plus odds, and you can buy the hook cheap (less than -130) you might want to do that too, but don't go higher than 2 or 2.5 units.
Since the point spread doesn't matter the majority of the time we'll take some nice plus odds for this one. The Cardinals are a drunken, useless, intermission NFL team. The Rams on the other hand aren't under the radar for us…at least not against this shitty team. Take each play for 3 units. "
MLB:
#908 Cincinnati Reds -1 +100 (3 units) WINNER!
Leake/Detweiler
The Reds faced some righties yesterday, and struggled with offense, but still pulled the win to put themselves only a game back of .500. A couple of scenarios where teams have done well: These are backed by numbers, but it is psychological. Cincinatti (65-66 / now -1 game off a win), Chicago White Sox (64-65 / now -1 game off win), and Toronto (66-65 / now +1 game off loss). Not a ton of weight in that, but it's an interesting trick to think about especially now. Where do teams find motivation? .500 when all hope is lost means something (history says so). Anyways, the Reds overcame the righties, now some lefties. They have an offense that is 29% better against lefties. Right now, that would be the biggest variation in the league. Big one here…Go Reds!
NBA:
————————————————————-
"Picks & Systems" – 9.17.2011
SDQL #002 - (NCAAFB)
ProcomputerGambler.com
THE RESULTS:
Current Season Record: 1-0-0 (100%) ATS
(Last Updated 9.20.2011)
Long Term Results: 56-26-0 (68.3%) ATS
(Last Updated 9.20.2011)
THE DESCRIPTION:
Keep this in one in your back pocket. It's based on four parameters, and simple concept: Since 1980, College Football teams that just rolled at least two opponents…both of the wins by at least by 4 TD margin are 56-26-0 (68.3%) ATS when they face a team that just gave up at least 5 TD's worth of points. Type, "and season" to see how this has done recently. It has been hot (up to 87.5% 30+ sample size).
[SDQL LINK]: "A and opo:points>=35 and p:margin>=28 and pp:margin>=28"
ACTIVE TRENDS (9/17):
STANFORD -8.5 WINNER
[EDIT] Week 3 went 1-0-0 ATS
ADDITIONAL READING:
Read this supplementary article to help you understand the main premise: Evidence of lucrative Momentum
—————————–
"Picks & Systems" – 9.17.2011
SDQL #001 - (NCAAFB)
ProcomputerGambler.com
THE RESULTS:
Current Season Record: 10-9-0 (52.6%) ATS
(Last Updated 9.20.2011)
Long Term Results: 610-470-19 (56.48%) ATS
(Last Updated 9.20.2011)
THE DESCRIPTION:
Since 1980, College Football teams less than -28 points at home are 757-330-6 (69.6%) SU and 608-466-19 (56.6%) ATS when they are off of any home game where they scored at least 41 points (5+ TD's and 2+ FG's). It is hard to stop a moving train in this league!
[SDQL LINK]: p:points>41 and p:site=home and site=home and line>-28
There are active Week 3 Selections (9/17):
ARKANSAS -23 LOSE
BOWLING GREEN -9 LOSE
FLORIDA ST. +3 LOSE
ILLINOIS -2 WIN
LOUISIANNA TECH +6 WIN
NEBRASKA -17 LOSE
[EDIT] Week 3 went 2-4-0 ATS
==
ADDITIONAL READING:
Read this supplementary article to help you understand the main premise: Evidence of lucrative Momentum
