flat betting vs kelly criterion

Flat Betting vs Kelly Criterion: Which Bet Sizing Method Wins Long-Term?

Two bet sizing methods dominate serious betting discussions:

  • Flat betting
  • The Kelly Criterion

Both are logical.
Both are mathematical.
Only one fits most bettors in the real world.


What Flat Betting Really Is

Flat betting means:

  • Same bet size
  • Every wager
  • Independent of confidence

Usually:

  • 1–2% of bankroll per bet

Flat betting assumes:

  • You might have an edge
  • But you respect uncertainty
  • And you prioritize survival

It’s conservative by design.


What the Kelly Criterion Tries to Do

The Kelly Criterion sizes bets based on:

  • Your estimated edge
  • The odds being offered

The formula attempts to:

  • Maximize long-term bankroll growth
  • Avoid ruin if inputs are perfect

And that’s the problem.


Kelly Works Only If You Know Your True Edge

Kelly assumes:

  • Accurate probabilities
  • Stable edges
  • Correct pricing

Most bettors:

  • Overestimate their edge
  • Use small samples
  • Confuse variance with skill

A small error in edge estimation leads to massive overbetting.


Why Kelly Feels So Powerful (At First)

Kelly betting often:

  • Starts fast
  • Grows aggressively
  • Produces impressive early curves

This is survivorship bias in action.

You don’t see:

  • The blown-up bankrolls
  • The unrecoverable drawdowns
  • The bettors who quit

Volatility: The Hidden Cost of Kelly

Even correctly applied Kelly betting:

  • Produces brutal swings
  • Creates deep drawdowns
  • Requires extreme emotional discipline

Many bettors abandon Kelly at the worst possible moment — after losses.

At that point, the math no longer matters.


Fractional Kelly: The Compromise

Some bettors use:

  • ½ Kelly
  • ¼ Kelly

This reduces volatility but introduces a question:

If you’re cutting Kelly down to survive…
Why not just flat bet?

Fractional Kelly slowly converges toward flat betting behavior anyway.


Why Professionals Prefer Flat Betting

Pros value:

  • Stability
  • Scalability
  • Predictable risk

Flat betting allows:

  • Clean performance analysis
  • Easier automation
  • Lower emotional load
  • Longer betting careers

Many “Kelly bettors” quietly flatten their bets over time.


Flat Betting Handles Bad Assumptions Better

When your edge estimate is wrong:

  • Kelly magnifies the mistake
  • Flat betting absorbs it

Flat betting is error-tolerant.
Kelly is not.


The Psychological Reality

Flat betting:

  • Reduces tilt
  • Prevents chasing
  • Keeps losses manageable

Kelly betting:

  • Encourages confidence-based sizing
  • Amplifies emotional reactions
  • Punishes hesitation

Most bettors are human — not equations.


Which One Should You Use?

For most bettors:

  • Flat betting wins
  • Kelly adds unnecessary risk
  • Survival beats optimization

Kelly belongs in:

  • Academic models
  • Simulations
  • Very controlled environments

Flat betting belongs in real bankrolls.


Final Verdict

If your goal is:

  • Longevity
  • Emotional control
  • Sustainable growth

Flat betting is the better choice.

Optimization doesn’t matter if you can’t stay solvent long enough to benefit from it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *