NCAAF Coaching Trends
#001 Bobby Hauck is 1-13 ATS with UNLV on the road Here’s something to consider for the next week of College football: Bobby Hauck is a nasty 0-14-0 (-33.79 ppg) SU and 1-13-0 (-14.07 ppg, 7.1%) ATS average line: +19.7 on the road with UNLV.
#002 Mike Gundy is O/U: 29-10-0 (+9.56 ppg, 74.4%) as the head coach of Oklahoma State when playing at home. That’s O/U: 20-3-0 (+11.80 ppg, 87.0%) average total: 65.8 – at home facing a team averaging 33 points or more per game. This week he’ll be facing TCU as a -7.5 home favorite with a total of 63.
#003 Dan Enos is just 3-16-0 (-11.95 ppg, 15.8%) SU and 4-15-0 (-8.47, 21.1%) ATS head coaching Central Michigan working on 6 days or less rest.
#004 Under head coach Donnie Jones, UCF is just 4-14 ATS after two or more straight losses.
#005 Since 2008, Washington State is just 10-48-0 (-18.38 ppg, 17.2%) SU on the weekend. People must have thought that when Mike Leach arrived in 2012, things would change, but if you took all of his opponents on the moneyline, you’d be up a tremendous amount in just 10 games.
#006 Under head coach Mike Leach, Washington State is just 1-9 SU (-15.3 ppg, 10%, +18.95 units) playing on Saturday.
#007 Under head coach Nick Saban, the Crimson Tide are 14-0-1 (-8.70 ppg) UNDER the Vegas total in the same situation. The average total was 45.1 in those games.
#008 Head Coach of Ohio State, Urban Meyer is 35-8 (+7.64 ppg, 81.4%) ATS in his career against conference opponents. That’s 42-4-0 (+24.43 ppg, 91.3%) Straight up! As college basketball continues to evolve, coaches are increasingly adopting emerging coaching styles in NCAAB to gain a competitive edge. These innovative approaches not only reflect the changing dynamics of the game but also emphasize player development and adaptability. Observing how different programs implement these strategies can provide valuable insights into future trends in the sport.
#009 Missouri has averaged a -4.6 point line under head coach Gary Pinkel in games off of a 17+ pt. win going just 19-24 SU for a huge loss of units. Rutgers:
#010 Since 1993, Rutgers is just 39-82 (-9.64 ppg, 32.2%) SU after a loss.
#011 Willie Taggart is just 6-15 (-30.55 units) SU in all home games he has ever coached. *Chuck Strong is 13-4 (76.5%, +14.85 units) SU and 12-5 ATS with Louisville on the road….that’s 6-1 6-1 off of 3+ straight conference games.
#012 Stanford’s David Shaw has coached the Cardinals well in all kinds of ways in the role of double digit favorite (but not really the lumber ie. -30, -40 etc). He’s 22-9 ATS after 2 or more straight wins with his team.
#013 Greg Schiano – 1-2 ATS – 2-0 OU v. Louisville Louisville is 2-4 desperately needing a win here; the Knights shot their wad in three wins, and now have a bunch of injuries. No one likes to bet a loser team especially for such an unsatisfying line, and now playing against a team on what looks like a hot streak. With injuries, and a 5-1 record; Rutgers can afford to slack here. Typically the vast majority of the wagers pile on the wrong side here. In this case Rutgers is backed by 80%. Here’s what happens to those bettors who back a -7.5 point or less team in this spot: 24-0 ATS (+10) – 21-5 SU (9.1) – 15-10 Over (2.8). By analyzing betting strategies from historical data, one can identify patterns that often lead to unexpected outcomes. This analysis becomes crucial, especially when considering the psychological aspect of betting on a team perceived to be on a hot streak. Understanding how past performance influences future bets can give bettors a significant edge in evaluating matchups.
#014 Under head coach Al Golden, Miami is 9-1 SU and 10-0-0 (+9.65 ppg, 100%) ATS with a modest line between +3.5 and -7. That’s 5-0 SU (+18.2 ppg) at home.
(Actually what is interesting is that, since all the way back to 1980, Miami is 80-14 (85.1%) SU off of a no cover SU win….)
#015 Al Golden is also 13-1 (+16.93 ppg) SU and 13-1 (+12.71 ppg) ATS in all games as a head coach with any team after his guys won SU but failed to cover.
